Staff Augmentation vs. Outsourcing: Which Is the Winner?

In the modern world, where things change every day, businesses face the strategic choice between staff augmentation and outsourcing best practices to fulfill their software development needs. As they navigate this dynamic landscape, trying to weigh the pros and cons of each approach, it is critical to choose the one that best suits their projects.

Giraffe Software knows everything about staff augmentation and outsourcing, and they will try to explain things so that you can make an informed decision.

What Is the Difference Between Staff Augmentation and Outsourcing?

First of all, you need to understand the difference between these approaches. When customers decide to opt for software development outsourcing services, they actually put the responsibility for a certain project to a third-party provider. The main goals, in this case, are usually to increase efficiency, reduce costs, and access specialized skills. In general, this model implies that the agency has full control and responsibility over the outsourced project, delivering the desired product according to the agreed terms.

Staff augmentation is a model according to which you extend your in-house team by hiring professionals from an external company. These employees work under your supervision and become a part of the existing team. Thanks to the staff augmentation, your business maintains seamless integration, direct control, and cost-effective resource utilization.

Advantages of Staff-Augmentation

The main benefits of staff augmentation are the following:

1. Retaining control and direct management. With this approach, the hired specialists become a part of your team, which means that you can control the development process. These professionals work under your guidance, following your directions and reporting directly to you.

2. Cost efficiency. You do not have to manage a variety of additional costs, such as taxes, vacation and sick days, accounting, fees, etc. In the case of this model, you can hire the right number of experts required to complete the project.

3. Staffing flexibility. It is possible to hire professionals for a certain project and end the contract with them as soon as the project is finished. With staff augmentation, there will be no complications of full-time hires.

4. Selection of certain skills. The method allows you to select professionals with the skills required for your project. For example, you might need a Python developer for one project and a JavaScript expert for another – you can hire them when necessary.

5. Direct communication. You obtain full access to any member of the team, which implies efficient communication and prompt feedback.

Cons of Staff Augmentation

Like any other model, including outsourcing best practices, staff augmentation has a few drawbacks. It does not mean that you should not opt for this option – it means that you need to consider:

1. Effective team management processes are required. If you are willing to manage this kind of team, you must establish and implement robust processes to ensure efficient task allocation and smooth coordination.

2. Delivery responsibility. The client is responsible for all delivery concerns, including meeting deadlines and reaching required outcomes.

3. Training and onboarding. The outstaffed team members might require extra training and onboarding.

Advantages of Project Outsourcing

Before you hire a software outsourcing company, you should learn about these advantages:

1. Cost savings and increased efficiency. This approach can eliminate the need for getting and training an in-house team and cut expenses associated with equipment and infrastructure.

2. Access to specialized knowledge and expertise. This model allows you to access teams with diverse skills and experience in various technologies.

3. Efficient project management. Outsourcing agencies tend to bring structure, efficiency, and accountability to projects, ensuring effective communication, smooth workflow, and timely delivery.

4. Scalability and flexibility. This model allows you to quickly scale your outsourcing partnerships up and down according to project requirements.

5. No hiring efforts. The chosen agency, like Giraffe Software, will pick the best professionals for you based on the required team stack, technical specifications, and optimal team composition.

Disadvantages of Outsourcing

The drawbacks of this approach include:

1. Limited control. Although you can supervise the project’s progress and provide feedback, direct control during the outsourcing lifecycle is not possible.

2. Communication challenges. Working with a team in a different geographical region can come with language barriers, cultural nuances, and time zone differences.


You must decide which model is best for your business because each has its own pros and cons. However, you can always contact Giraffe Software if you do not understand the outsourcing lifecycle or have any other questions. They know everything about both models and can help you apply any of them.

At Giraffe Software, we realize the importance of making the right decisions, so we are there to provide you with the right solutions.

Staff Augmentation vs. Outsourcing: Which Is the Winner? was last updated May 20th, 2024 by Abigail Laidlaw